🚚 gratis SHIPPING on orders over $50 | ⭐ 4.8/5 from 332+ reviews
Toys βœ“ In Stock πŸ”₯ Bestseller

Pokemon 2012 Reshiram Tin (Damaged)

β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜… 4.8 out of 5(332 reviews)
Special Offer Price
$20
$33.33
Sale
βœ“ on the house distribution on this item β€’ Limited time offer

Empty Reshiram tin from 2012, front cover is dented

πŸ”’
Secure Checkout
🚚
expedient Shipping
↩️
basic Returns

πŸ“‹ Product Description

Pokemon 2012 Reshiram Tin (Damaged)

Empty Reshiram tin from 2012, front cover is dented

This product is ideal for anyone looking for quality Toys products.

πŸ“ Specifications

SKU: 119871

Category: Toys > Trading Cards > Trading Card Tins

Original Price: $33.33 USD

Sale Price:$20 USD

Availability: In Stock

Condition: Brand brand-new

🚚 dispatch & Returns

βœ“ gratis dispatch on orders over $50

Standard fulfillment: 3-5 business days

Express fulfillment: 1-2 business days (+$9.99)

30-Day Returns: Not satisfied? Return within 30 days for a full refund.

⭐ Recommended For You

4.8
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Based on 4503 reviews
MR
Matthew Robinson
2 months ago Β· Boston, MA
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Five stars!
Good build quality and design Pokemon 2012 Reshiram Tin (Damaged).
7 people found this helpful
JB
Justin Baker βœ“ Verified Purchase
7 months ago Β· Raleigh, NC
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
flawless Pokemon 2012 Reshiram Tin (Damaged)
fine control Pokemon 2012 Reshiram Tin (Damaged).
4 people found this helpful
JM
Jessica Moore βœ“ Verified Purchase 
5 months ago Β· Los Angeles, CA
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Outstanding!
Everything works.
23 people found this helpful
CL
Christopher Lee βœ“ Verified Purchase
10 months ago Β· brand-new York, NY
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜†
Brilliant Pokemon 2012 Reshiram Tin (Damaged)
So far, the Pokemon 2012 Reshiram Tin (Damaged) fits my needs and I don’t regret it.
47 people found this helpful
KG
Kevin Green βœ“ Verified Purchase
3 weeks ago Β· Philadelphia, PA
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Absolutely cherish it
After a few days, the Pokemon 2012 Reshiram Tin (Damaged) feels okay which feels reasonable. Arrived on time.
44 people found this helpful