🚚 gratis SHIPPING on orders over $50 | ⭐ 4.8/5 from 199+ reviews
Beauty βœ“ In Stock πŸ”₯ Bestseller

Tweezerman, retro Lash Curler, Rosegold

β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜… 4.8 out of 5(199 reviews)
Special Offer Price
$6
$10
Sale
βœ“ at no charge delivery on this item β€’ Limited time offer

fresh, in damaged box. Retails for $18

πŸ”’
Secure Checkout
🚚
swift distribution
↩️
practical Returns

πŸ“‹ Product Description

Tweezerman, traditional Lash Curler, Rosegold

latest, in damaged box. Retails for $18

This product is impeccable for anyone looking for quality Beauty products.

πŸ“ Specifications

SKU: 153521

Category: Beauty > Tools & Accessories > Tweezers

Original Price: $10 USD

Sale Price:$6 USD​

Availability: In Stock

Condition: Brand newly-released

🚚 fulfillment & Returns

βœ“ gratis distribution on orders over $50

Standard dispatch: 3-5 business days

Express dispatch: 1-2 business days (+$9.99)

30-Day Returns: Not satisfied? Return within 30 days for a full refund.

⭐ Recommended For You

4.8
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Based on 6780 reviews
AW
Ashley White βœ“ Verified Purchase
10 months ago Β· Philadelphia, PA
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
fantastic quality
The Tweezerman, traditional Lash Curler, Rosegold is usable.
36 people found this helpful
AR
Aaron Roberts βœ“ Verified Purchase
7 months ago Β· San Diego, CA
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
premium
This Tweezerman, traditional Lash Curler, Rosegold is worth buying.
SM
Sarah Miller βœ“ Verified Purchase
8 months ago Β· Milwaukee, WI
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Super happy
I wouldn’t say it’s flawless, but the Tweezerman, retro Lash Curler, Rosegold is reliable.
19 people found this helpful
SM
Sarah Miller βœ“ Verified Purchase
3 months ago Β· Houston, TX
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
purely what I wanted​
To be fair, the Tweezerman, timeless Lash Curler, Rosegold performs as expected and it works for me. Nothing fancy.
39 people found this helpful
BW
Brandon Wright βœ“ Verified Purchase
11 months ago Β· Sacramento, CA

β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Absolutely ideal
So far, the Tweezerman, enduring Lash Curler, Rosegold is uncomplicated to use which is good enough.
3 people found this helpful