🚚 gratis SHIPPING on orders over $50 | ⭐ 4.3/5 from 843+ reviews
Vintage ✓ In Stock 🔥 Bestseller

Vintage mixing bowl

★★★★★ 4.3 out of 5(843 reviews)
Special Offer Price
$31.5
$52.5
Sale
✓ on the house distribution on this item • Limited time offer

Salt Glaze blue stoneware crock bowl. mixing bowl depression kitchen bowl old farmhouse utilitarian stoneware bowl Blue10” wide 6”deep

🔒
Secure Checkout
🚚
express dispatch
↩️
uncomplicated Returns

📋 Product Description

Vintage mixing bowl

Salt Glaze blue stoneware crock bowl. mixing bowl depression kitchen bowl old farmhouse utilitarian stoneware bowl Blue
10” wide 6”deep

This product is superb for anyone looking for quality Vintage products.

📐 Specifications

SKU: 752785

Category: Vintage > Houseware > Bowls

Original Price: $52.5 USD

Sale Price:$31.5 USD

Availability: In Stock

Condition: Brand recent

🚚 dispatch & Returns

✓ gratis dispatch on orders over $50

Standard fulfillment: 3-5 business days

Express fulfillment: 1-2 business days (+$9.99)

30-Day Returns: Not satisfied? Return within 30 days for a full refund.

Recommended For You

4.3
★★★★★
Based on 8990 reviews
DA
David Anderson ✓ Verified Purchase
8 months ago · Tucson, AZ
★★★★★
extraordinary Vintage mixing bowl
The Vintage mixing bowl arrived without defects.
10 people found this helpful
RM
Robert Martinez ✓ Verified Purchase
3 months ago · Tampa, FL
★★★★★
splendid choice
So far, the Vintage mixing bowl is handy to use and it’s fine overall.
7 people found this helpful
WG
William Garcia ✓ Verified Purchase
5 months ago · Fresno, CA
★★★★★
exceptional Vintage mixing bowl!
In daily use, the Vintage mixing bowl fits my needs and I don’t regret it. Nothing fancy.
16 people found this helpful​
MW
Michelle Walker ✓ Verified Purchase
1 month ago · Raleigh, NC
★★★★★
outstanding choice
To be fair, it fits my needs and it meets expectations.
12 people found this helpful
TT
Thomas Taylor ✓ Verified Purchase
5 months ago · Fort Worth, TX​
★★★★★
splendid investment
Honestly, the Vintage mixing bowl is effortless to use so it’s acceptable.
13 people found this helpful