🚚 gratis SHIPPING on orders over $50 | ⭐ 4.4/5 from 504+ reviews
Men βœ“ In Stock πŸ”₯ Bestseller

ONSHELLAS - Shorts - beige

β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜… 4.4 out of 5(504 reviews)
Special Offer Price
$23
$38.33
Sale
βœ“ on the house distribution on this item β€’ Limited time offer

Rise : NormalPockets : Back pocket, side pocketsPattern : PlainDetails : Elasticated waistArticle number : OS322F0I0-B11

πŸ”’
Secure Checkout
🚚
expedient Shipping

↩️
basic Returns

πŸ“‹ Product Description

ONSHELLAS - Shorts - beige

Rise : Normal
Pockets : Back pocket, side pockets
Pattern : Plain
Details : Elasticated waist
Article number : OS322F0I0-B11

This product is ideal for anyone looking for quality Men products.

πŸ“ Specifications

SKU: 1176273

Category: Men > Clothing > Shorts

Original Price: $38.33 USD

Sale Price:$23 USD

Availability: In Stock

Condition: Brand brand-new

🚚 dispatch & Returns

βœ“ gratis dispatch on orders over $50

Standard fulfillment: 3-5 business days

Express fulfillment: 1-2 business days (+$9.99)

30-Day Returns: Not satisfied? Return within 30 days for a full refund.

⭐ Recommended For You

4.4
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Based on 9582 reviews
NH
Nicole Harris βœ“ Verified Purchase
3 months ago Β· Memphis, TN
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜†
terrific value for money
So far, it is practical and it works for me.
35 people found this helpful
RH
Ryan Hill βœ“ Verified Purchase
11 months ago Β· Austin, TX

β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Couldn't be happier
In daily use, the ONSHELLAS - Shorts - beige is practical and I don’t regret it.
4 people found this helpful
JB
Justin Baker βœ“ Verified Purchase
8 months ago Β· Honolulu, HI
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜†
Five stars!
it works fine and I’m satisfied.
29 people found this helpful​
DC
Daniel Clark βœ“ Verified Purchase
2 months ago Β· Raleigh, NC
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
finest decision
In daily use, it is hassle-on the house to use which is good enough.
37 people found this helpful
MW
Michelle Walker βœ“ Verified Purchase
8 months ago Β· Cincinnati, OH
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜†
Five stars!
To be fair, it performs as expected which is good enough.
12 people found this helpful