🚚 gratis SHIPPING on orders over $50 | ⭐ 4.9/5 from 995+ reviews
Toys βœ“ In Stock πŸ”₯ Bestseller

Lot Of Vintage POGS and Slammer

β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜… 4.9 out of 5(995 reviews)
Special Offer Price
$13​
$21.67
Sale
βœ“ on the house distribution on this item β€’ Limited time offer

Lot of 268 POGS and 14 Slammer

πŸ”’
Secure Checkout
🚚
expedient Shipping
↩️
basic Returns

πŸ“‹ Product Description

Lot Of Vintage POGS and Slammer

Lot of 268 POGS and 14 Slammer

This product is ideal for anyone looking for quality Toys products.

πŸ“ Specifications

SKU: 2083260

Category: Toys > Vintage & Antique Toys > Games

Original Price: $21.67 USD

Sale Price:$13 USD

Availability: In Stock

Condition: Brand brand-new

🚚 dispatch & Returns

βœ“ gratis dispatch on orders over $50

Standard fulfillment: 3-5 business days

Express fulfillment: 1-2 business days (+$9.99)

30-Day Returns: Not satisfied? Return within 30 days for a full refund.

⭐ Recommended For You

4.9
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Based on 3064 reviews
KC
Kayla Campbell βœ“ Verified Purchase
11 months ago Β· Nashville, TN
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
extremely satisfied
Everything seems okay with the Lot Of Vintage POGS and Slammer.
14 people found this helpful
AC
Amber Carter βœ“ Verified Purchase
8 months ago Β· San Jose, CA
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Exceeded expectations
For the price, the Lot Of Vintage POGS and Slammer works as described and it’s fine overall. No setup issues.
18 people found this helpful
JW
Jennifer Wilson βœ“ Verified Purchase
11 months ago Β· Las Vegas, NV
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Exceeded expectations
For the price, it fits my needs and it works for me. Arrived on time.
26 people found this helpful
AW
Ashley White βœ“ Verified Purchase
4 months ago Β· Oakland, CA
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
appreciate love love!
At first, the Lot Of Vintage POGS and Slammer feels solid and it meets expectations.
28 people found this helpful
MR
Matthew Robinson βœ“ Verified Purchase
11 months ago Β· Raleigh, NC
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
No complaints
For the price, the Lot Of Vintage POGS and Slammer does its job which is good enough.
6 people found this helpful